i love saturdays. there’s something inherently laidback and relaxing about saturdays. which is hardly surprising because i usually associate this day with sleeping late, gimiks, entertainment, or just lazing around my place…
today i was rudely awakened (in more ways than one) from this absurd fallacy. i think i was in the middle of some pleasant dream, when suddenly this horribly grating, eardrum-assaulting music blared out right under my window. i wasn’t about to go down without a fight though. with eyes determinedly shut, i slapped a pillow over my head and tried to ignore the cacophony.
it was no use. after that ghastly intro, the loudspeaker blasted into life. “mga kabaranggay, sa darating na halalan, wag po nating kalimutan–”
feeling somewhat homicidal, i bolted from my bed, slammed the window shut, pulled the curtains down and tried to sleep once more.
fat chance. after 10 minutes i had to give up. even if i could drown out the speaker’s voice, it was the music that was the real killer. the singer (female) was extolling some local politician’s virtues in an awful campaign jingle set to Jennifer Lopez’s “Let’s Get Loud” (and it was!). i was hoping that — by some merciful act of fate — the campaign jeep would somehow move on say after 10 minutes, but no, the recalcitrant thing just stayed there like a leech for what seemed like an eternity.
at 9:10am i gave up the fight and reluctantly turned on my radio to dilute the din. a few minutes later, the jeep went on its merry way to assault another street corner…
which brings me to an interesting point. would somebody please tell me why politicians (or their managers or whoever it is that orchestrates this mess) almost always choose the worst kind of background songs to punctuate their campaign spots or ads? ever since i was old enough to to remember such things, i have yet to hear a campaign song that i can tolerate or (however unlikely) actually like.
well, of course, i can understand it if all they’re aiming for is the song’s shock value or the fact that, if played loudly enough to wake the dead, it might actually browbeat the voter into submission — and thereby drive him/her to vote for the said candidate, if only to stop the aural torture. but i wish those old fogeys would consider the hapless listeners. please guys, there are less blood-curdling ways to torture us, voters (listeners). at least choose a better song. or better yet, please don’t drown us with your crap on saturday morning. some of us are trying to catch up on our sleep after a week’s slog.
P.S. umm… or maybe it’s about time we petition the Comelec to disqualify the candidates with the worst-sounding campaign jingle *mwahahaha*. if nothing else, this will motivate the campaign managers to aim for better quality jingles.
thanks wits. this ought to put a damper on my gripes weheheh. i was fairly steaming when i wrote this piece. i have this tendency to grumble endlessly when somebody/something wakes me up earlier than planned
and since politics and elections are two of my least favorite topics anyway, i guess it was inevitable… i still don’t like campaign jingles though. if anything, they’re a complete turn-off for me as a voter
This is a funny post. Count me in when you go to Comelec!
I have a friend who is running for office and I told him not to expect a vote from me because of his jingle. According to his PR head, a politician’s jingle has to cater to everyone… the voting public!
Posted by alvin at April 30, 2007, 2:01 pmSomething popped into the gray-matter when I read this post. Usually campaign jingles are songs that are, as wits says, defiled. Now these songs are copy righted, right? Now the question is by using their chosen song are they not committing any copy right infringement, if they have not secured a written permission from the owner of such material?
If they did, geez! just imagine our would be law-makers have become law-breakers in the first place.
Just a thought.
. Hehehe
Yep, the jingles and those who benefit from them deserve the negative criticisms. It working all right but i don’t like its effects. Pichay’s Pro Pinoy song is stuck in my head. ugh.
Posted by wits at May 2, 2007, 9:31 amyes, alvin, why don’t we ![]()
actually i have a couple of relatives who are reelectionists, but i’ve always stayed away from their political activities so i don’t know what their jingles sound like (and i hope i don’t)
john, that occurred to me, too. thanks for pointing that out. if i were the composer, i’d tell them to bug off. but i guess it’s a way for record companies to make chunks of money (assuming they get paid), so…
wits, that’s my point exactly. as they say, “you reap what you sow”
i doubt they get paid. politicians just rip out music without license.
good thing the honchos from my side of the planet aren’t as creative to have jingles. or maybe i’m just lucky enough NOT to be caught with my panties down.
Posted by liz at May 2, 2007, 3:01 pmgeez… am I glad I’m spared from the irritating noise pollution of election jingles?
Posted by Daisy at May 2, 2007, 3:01 pm@liz: really? now, why doesn’t that surprise me. those guys…
@daisy: it gets worse by the day, esp. now that election day is barely 2 weeks away. don’t you just miss it?
Posted by onyxx at May 2, 2007, 5:12 pmActually, they’re required to pay royalty fees. But there are some politicians that doesn’t pay.. Like a senatorial candidate who once ran as a vice president. But most songwriters are wise, they ask for payments upfront now.
And yes, the jingles are made for the voting public, for its recognizable tunes that makes most people “hypnotized” by it. Unfortunately, we have to endure this until next week.
Posted by twistedkai at May 2, 2007, 7:09 pm
i think the campaign managers have reasons why they picked and defiled the songs now used for political advertisements. (1) the songs appeal to the masses. as corny and as crappy the music may sound to us, the masses find these music appealing. it brings name recall. and since majority of Filipinos are part of the “masa” group, the politicians themselves do not have much a choice if they want to win votes. (2) they conducted studies as to which music can produce a good LSS (last song syndrome). this cunning tactic is very dirty as it would not only affect the intended targets but everybody who hears the damned music. (3) the campaign managers are simply corny themselves.
Posted by wits at April 30, 2007, 12:36 pm