as time goes on, the more convinced i get about being born in the wrong era. or at very least, perhaps i’m a throwback from a bygone timeframe that has long since lost its relevance. (translation: that’s how depressed i feel these days.)
i stumbled into this conclusion the other day when i realized that most of the things that really interest me are either things that dwell too much in the past or topics that have some sort of ‘history’ attached to them.
take, for instance, my inordinate fondness for fantasy books. well, of course, i do like science fiction too, but if i were to choose which of them appeals to me more — it would be the Fantasy genre hands down. (i’m a fan of JRR Tolkien, Tracy Hickman & Margaret Weis, Susannah Clarke, Neil Gaiman, Piers Anthony, etc.). somebody once equated Science Fiction = Future, Fantasy = Past (because of its heavy use of medieval settings), which should give you a clue about what i’m driving at.
another sign would be my fascination for well-preserved historical buildings (although this could be mostly due to my course) and landmarks. and then there’s my general fondness for history itself (well, certain parts of world history, anyway) and several historical figures.
the more i see about the current situation, the more pessimistic i get. it’s like the whole world has passed me by, going through changes that have somehow left me isolated and curiously detached. sometimes i get the feeling that i’m stuck in a time warp or something.
or — as an irreverent friend had suggested — it could just be a form of arrested development. perhaps after hitting a certain age, i had suddenly stopped growing and instead of going forward, i kept yearning for the past. sheesh. now, that’s depressing.
aaah, wouldn’t it be fun to have a time machine?
ever wondered who you where in the past?
Posted by Joyce at September 26, 2008, 2:42 amliving in the past sounds fun zar, except that i’ll probably miss all those ‘modern-day’ conveniences that i’ve gotten attached to…
joyce i don’t know anything about having existed before but if i did, it’s highly likely that i would’ve been a paranoid slacker, too
Posted by onyxx at September 27, 2008, 12:53 amtha’s my best guess too. hahaha. just kidding.
cheers!
Posted by Joyce at September 30, 2008, 11:00 pmtouché
if i were given an option to see the past or see the future, i’d definitely, definitely pick the past. earth has already surpassed its greatest time. too bad, i was born after that. i don’t think there would ever be an era richer in culture, music, and arts than that of the golden past.
i’d alsolove to live inside my fantasy books.
exactly! i guess us Fantasy fans just can’t get enough of the past huh?
or maybe it’s because we just simply refuse to grow up — hence our Peter Pan fixation for (the utterly fascinating) make-believe/alternate reality… either way, i say it’s because reality is no match to our fertile imagination nyahaha
Posted by onyxx at October 14, 2008, 3:16 amI propose not to hold back until you get big sum of money to order goods! You should get the loan or just consolidation loans and feel yourself free
Posted by CHERRYBurris25 at May 6, 2011, 1:11 am
I think I would’ve done well in the past. Well, at least during a war-free era.
Posted by zarine at September 24, 2008, 3:20 pm